|
Let's get one thing clear right from the beginning;
the attacker has more men and more guns than you. That's
why he's attacking you. No, he does not have the same
number. He has more, sometimes much more, as in Champion
Hill and Antietam.
Think about other battles, such as Thermopylae where
only 300 Spartans were attacked by something like 100,000
Persians (if Herodatus is to be believed).
Now, would it make sense for the Spartans to go and
attack the Persians? Not really. They waited in a mountain
pass and held the Persians off (until some rat showed
the Persians a path around their rear).
The point is the attacker has more stuff than you.
So what does this mean? It means they can usually afford
to take more casualties than you. Plus it means they
can inflict casualties on you at a greater rate.
If you stand shoulder to shoulder with a numerically
superior enemy, trading shots with them, expect to quickly
loose the battle. Your brigades will whither faster
and you won't be able to replace them, where as the
attacker will.
How can the defender even this up? Simply put, you
have to force the attacker to come at you "one
at a time" so they cannot bring their greater weight
of numbers to bare.
If we take the Thermopylae example again the Greeks
set up at a part of the pass that was only two meters
wide. Although they had only about 1,000 men, including
300 Spartans, the Persians could only fight them with
a small fraction of their vastly greater force. Up until
Ephialtes showed Xerxes how to get around the mountain
pass the Greeks killed wave after wave of Persians (as
they were better armoured and had longer spears).
There is no doubt that if they had met the Persians
in open terrain they would have been killed in a very
short time, as happened when they had to retreat out
of the small defile.
Such lessons can be used in Line of Muskets and other
wargames. If you are the defender, with a smaller number
of troops, you have to force the opponent to come at
you so they cannot use all their troops at the same
time, giving you a local superiority.
Take for example the battle of Antietam. There has
been quite a bit of talk on the site that Antietam is
very difficult for the South to win. Not so. It depends
on how the South, the defenders, go about fighting the
battle. If they advance out of their trenches to "push"
the enemy back, they can expect to be shot to bits for
very little loss to the attackers. Then they shall certainly
loose.
However, if they stand back, in places where the Union
cannot shoot at them, then the Union has to come and
get them.
Then the Rebs can attempt to get a local superiority
in firepower. How do you do that?
The most powerful weapon in the American Civil War
was artillery firing canister. This is a cannon firing
not one single solid ball (solid shot) but lots of small
balls. In fact often the gunners didn't even bother
to use real canister shot but stuffed down the barrel
anything they could find; rocks, nails, etc. (which
is why an "out of ammo" gun can still fire
canister at full effect).
One battery firing canister has about the same effect
as 2,000 men firing their muskets (ten strength points).
So why not sit back and wait for the enemy with several
guns ready to shred his brigades? It is the easiest
way for the defender to even up the odds.
As the enemy comes on if they run into a fresh brigade
with three batteries firing canister (range 1 hex) it
is likely that the attacking brigade will be destroyed
for little or no loss to the defender.
As the defender you want to hang back, base your defence
on a well formed gun line, and wait.
|